User talk:Bloodofox: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Bloodofox/Archive 3. (BOT)
→‎AE warning: new section
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 16: Line 16:
|archivebox=yes
|archivebox=yes
}}
}}

== AE warning ==

Hi, Bloodofox. I have closed [[Special:Permalink/1190127476#Bloodofox|the AE request]] regarding you, with remedies including the following [[WP:AELOG/2023#Falun Gong 2|logged]] warning:{{tq2|All editors in the Falun Gong topic area, and Bloodofox in particular, are warned to not speculate about other editors' religious views, nor to attempt to disqualify others' comments based on actual or perceived religious views.}}While [[WP:AGF is not a suicide pact|AGF is not a suicide pact]] and there may be times when it is appropriate to point out that other editors are editing in a biased manner, it really should never be necessary to speculate as to their motives or personal views. Even where an editor is in fact pushing a religious POV, such comments can have a chilling effect on people with the same views who edit constructively. So focus on content, or if necessary on conduct, but not on contributor.

I wish you a happy <relevant winter holiday here>. <span style="font-family:courier"> -- [[User:Tamzin|<span style="color:#E6007A">Tamzin</span>]]</span><sup class="nowrap">&#91;[[User talk:Tamzin|<i style="color:#E6007A">cetacean needed</i>]]&#93;</sup> <small>(they&#124;xe&#124;she)</small> 02:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:59, 16 December 2023

AE warning

Hi, Bloodofox. I have closed the AE request regarding you, with remedies including the following logged warning:

All editors in the Falun Gong topic area, and Bloodofox in particular, are warned to not speculate about other editors' religious views, nor to attempt to disqualify others' comments based on actual or perceived religious views.

While AGF is not a suicide pact and there may be times when it is appropriate to point out that other editors are editing in a biased manner, it really should never be necessary to speculate as to their motives or personal views. Even where an editor is in fact pushing a religious POV, such comments can have a chilling effect on people with the same views who edit constructively. So focus on content, or if necessary on conduct, but not on contributor.

I wish you a happy <relevant winter holiday here>. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 02:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]