User talk:+JMJ+: Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Cukrakalnis/Archives/2023/October. (BOT) Tag: Replaced |
HJ Mitchell (talk | contribs) →AE result: new section |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Cukrakalnis/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=90|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=User talk:Cukrakalnis/Archives/|format=Y/F|age=90|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
||
== AE result == |
|||
I am closing the [[Special:PermaLink/1182223450#Cukrakalnis|AE request]] opened against you. The finding of uninvolved administrators was the your editing is not in keeping with the standards expected of editors in contentious topic areas. In particular, you have repeatedly focused your comments on other editors and their perceived motives rather than on content matters, and [[WP:BATTLE|treated Wikipedia as a battleground]]. The aim of Wikipedians should always be to reflect sources as neutrally and accurately as possible. Editors may disagree in good faith about the best way to do that, in which case they should use the talk page to professionally and civilly discuss their concerns. Where editors cannot agree, you can ask for a [[WP:3O|third opinion]] or use another form of [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], or ask for wider community input (for example with a [[WP:RFC|request for comment]]). If another editor is being disruptive and obstructing a discussion, you can request administrator intervention at [[WP:AE]] (for subjects covered by a [[WP:CTOP|contentious topic designation]]) or [[WP:ANI]]. '''Please consider this a final warning that any further personally directed comments will result in sanctions'''. This warning will be recorded in the arbitration enforcement log and can be appealed by following [[Wikipedia:Contentious_topics#Appeals_and_amendments|the appeals process]]. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<b style="color: teal; font-family: Tahoma">HJ Mitchell</b>]] | [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<span style="color: navy; font-family: Times New Roman" title="(Talk page)">Penny for your thoughts?</span>]] 15:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:24, 28 October 2023
AE result
I am closing the AE request opened against you. The finding of uninvolved administrators was the your editing is not in keeping with the standards expected of editors in contentious topic areas. In particular, you have repeatedly focused your comments on other editors and their perceived motives rather than on content matters, and treated Wikipedia as a battleground. The aim of Wikipedians should always be to reflect sources as neutrally and accurately as possible. Editors may disagree in good faith about the best way to do that, in which case they should use the talk page to professionally and civilly discuss their concerns. Where editors cannot agree, you can ask for a third opinion or use another form of dispute resolution, or ask for wider community input (for example with a request for comment). If another editor is being disruptive and obstructing a discussion, you can request administrator intervention at WP:AE (for subjects covered by a contentious topic designation) or WP:ANI. Please consider this a final warning that any further personally directed comments will result in sanctions. This warning will be recorded in the arbitration enforcement log and can be appealed by following the appeals process. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)