User talk:4TheWynne: Difference between revisions
→Nomination of West Coast Club Champion (AFL Women's) for deletion: Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient notification template |
→Editor of the Week: Sorry for the delay. Connection problems. |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week''' |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week''' |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of your work relate to women's sports. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span> |
||
|} |
|} |
||
[[User: |
[[User:Hawkeye7]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]: |
||
:I nominate 4TheWynne to be this weeks Editor of the Week for his work on pages related to women's sports, particularly the [[AFL Women's]] competition. He has taken several articles to GA status and [[Kim Clijsters]] and [[Erin Phillips]] to featured. 69% of his 25000 edits are to Mainspace. His range of interest extends from the [[Fast & Furious]] action film franchise and [[Australian rules football]] to page protection and vandal intervention. His commitment to Wikipedia is appreciated by all. |
|||
:{{{nominationtext}}} |
|||
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: |
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: |
||
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre> |
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre> |
||
Revision as of 06:23, 23 May 2021
 |
|
How are Facts Disruptive? And worthy of denying?
How do you come to that conclusion?
Why is discussing the fact according to Australian Anti Discrimination laws the AFL discriminates against trans females disruptive? Because its a fact you dont want discussed?
The quality, level and skill of the competition and its players is disruptive? Theres no problem on wiki stating this in other areas! Why is the AFL Womens league an exclusion? I would like to know.
Tho I get the feeling you will not have any answer!--Cynthia BrownSmyth (talk) 06:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- Cynthia BrownSmyth, as a matter of fact, I do: you are using a talk page as a forum, which is disruptive (and I noticed you had already been warned about it before). I reverted your "facts" because you appeared to just be making explosive claims/talking about things that weren't relevant to the AFL Women's article and being unhelpful in general, rather than suggesting ways to improve the article (which is what the talk page is for). For example, how is "Australian Female AFL team beaten by boys High School Team! – Shouldnt this momentous match be recorded here?" in any way helpful, and why would you say "How is the skill level/quality of players and the standard of the competition not relevant?" in response to my revert when that's got nothing to do with what you said or why I reverted you? Hannah Mouncey not being allowed to enter into the 2018 draft is mentioned at the Australian Football League article (see this section), but "according to Australian Anti Discrimination laws the AFL discriminates against trans females" is unsourced, and therefore makes it appear like you're using the talk page as a forum. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 07:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Suggesting adding important facts "is a forum" (I bet thats a throw away line you like to use!) Ah NO! The fact they discriminate and break Australian laws is not relevant? I guess to a bigot it would not be, but to people who oppose discrimination and law breaking might see it differently. "but "according to Australian Anti Discrimination laws the AFL discriminates against trans females" is unsourced" well here you go https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_rights_in_Australia! So now you are ok to state the fact they illegally discriminate? Do you agree the fact they do illegally discriminate should be in the article? https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-19/aflw-trans-players/10911114. BTW want me to remove everything on that page that is not sourced? :) Double standard kicks in again?
So on to the much lower standard, do you think this important fact should be in the article? (Every other sporting articles talks about how good players/teams are or arnt). Why shouldnt this competition be treated the same?Cynthia BrownSmyth (talk) 08:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daisy Pearce
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daisy Pearce you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 02:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Daisy Pearce
The article Daisy Pearce you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Daisy Pearce for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of West Coast Club Champion (AFL Women's) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Coast Club Champion (AFL Women's) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Onel5969 TT me 13:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Editor of the Week
|
Editor of the Week | |
| Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your work relate to women's sports. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Hawkeye7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- I nominate 4TheWynne to be this weeks Editor of the Week for his work on pages related to women's sports, particularly the AFL Women's competition. He has taken several articles to GA status and Kim Clijsters and Erin Phillips to featured. 69% of his 25000 edits are to Mainspace. His range of interest extends from the Fast & Furious action film franchise and Australian rules football to page protection and vandal intervention. His commitment to Wikipedia is appreciated by all.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 14:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)