Annual summary of 2020 gwern.net newsletters, selecting my best writings, the best 2020 links by topic, and the best books/movies/anime I saw in 2020, with some general discussion of the year. newsletter 2019-12-26–2021-01-11notescertainty: logimportance: 0
Annual summary of 2020 gwern.net newsletters, selecting my best writings, the best 2020 links by topic, and the best books/movies/anime I saw in 2020, with some general discussion of the year.
Newsletter tag: archive of all issues back to 2013 for the gwern.net newsletter (monthly updates, which will include summaries of projects I’ve worked on that month (the same as the changelog), collations of links or discussions from my subreddit, and book/movie reviews.)
GPT-3, announced by OpenAI in May 2020, is the largest neural network ever trained, by over an order of magnitude. Trained on Internet text data, it is the successor to GPT-2, which had surprised everyone by its natural language understanding & generation ability. To the surprise of most (including myself), this vast increase in size did not run into diminishing or negative returns, as many expected, but the benefits of scale continued to happen as forecasted by OpenAI. These benefits were not merely learning more facts & text than GPT-2, but qualitatively distinct & even more surprising in showing meta-learning: while GPT-2 learned how to do common natural language tasks like text summarization, GPT-3 instead learned how to follow directions and learn new tasks from a few examples. (As a result, GPT-3 outputs & interaction are more fascinating & human-like than GPT-2.)
While the immediate applications of GPT-3, like my poetry or humor writings, are nice, the short-term implications of GPT-3 are much more important.
First, while GPT-3 is expensive by conventional DL standards, it is cheap by scientific/commercial/military/government budget standards, and the results indicate that models could be made much larger. Second, models can also be made much more powerful, as GPT is an old approach known to be flawed in both minor & major ways, and far from an ‘ideal’ Transformer. Third, GPT-3’s capabilities come from learning on raw (unsupervised) data; that has long been one of the weakest areas of DL, holding back progress in other areas like reinforcement learning or robotics. Models like GPT-3 suggest that large unsupervised models will be vital components of future DL systems, as they can be ‘plugged into’ systems to immediately provide understanding of the world, humans, natural language, and reasoning.
The meta-learning has a longer-term implication: it is a demonstration of the blessings of scale, where problems with simple neural networks vanish, and they become more powerful, more generalizable, more human-like when simply made very large & trained on very large datasets with very large compute—even though those properties are believed to require complicated architectures & fancy algorithms (and this perceived need drives much research). Unsupervised models benefit from this, as training on large corpuses like Internet-scale text present a myriad of difficult problems to solve; this is enough to drive meta-learning despite GPT not being designed for meta-learning in any way. (This family of phenomena is perhaps driven by neural networks functioning as ensembles of many sub-networks with them all averaging out to an Occam’s razor, which for small data & models, learn superficial or memorized parts of the data, but can be forced into true learning by making the problems hard & rich enough; as meta-learners learn amortized Bayesian inference, they build in informative priors when trained over many tasks, and become dramatically more sample-efficient and better at generalization.)
The blessings of scale in turn support a radical theory: an old AI paradigm held by a few pioneers in connectionism (early artificial neural network research) and by more recent deep learning researchers, the scaling hypothesis. The scaling hypothesis regards the blessings of scale as the secret of AGI: intelligence is ‘just’ simple neural units & learning algorithms applied to diverse experiences at a (currently) unreachable scale. As increasing computational resources permit running such algorithms at the necessary scale, the neural networks will get ever more intelligent.
When? Estimates of Moore’s law-like progress curves decades ago by pioneers like Hans Moravec indicated that it would take until the 2010s for the sufficiently-cheap compute for tiny insect-level prototype systems to be available, and the 2020s for the first sub-human systems to become feasible, and these forecasts are holding up. (Despite this vindication, the scaling hypothesis is so unpopular an idea, and difficult to prove in advance rather than as a fait accompli, that while the GPT-3 results finally drew some public notice after OpenAI enabled limited public access & people could experiment with it live, it is unlikely that many entities will modify their research philosophies, much less kick off an ‘arms race’.)
More concerningly, GPT-3’s scaling curves, unpredicted meta-learning, and success on various anti-AI challenges suggests that in terms of futurology, AI researchers’ forecasts are an emperor sans garments: they have no coherent model of how AI progress happens or why GPT-3 was possible or what specific achievements should cause alarm, where intelligence comes from, and do not learn from any falsified predictions. Their primary concerns appear to be supporting the status quo, placating public concern, and remaining respectable. As such, their comments on AI risk are meaningless: they would make the same public statements if the scaling hypothesis were true or not.
Depending on what investments are made into scaling DL, and how fast compute grows, the 2020s should be quite interesting—sigmoid or singularity?
June 2020 gwern.net newsletter with 3 new pages/essays, and links on CRISPR, population screening, AI scaling, politics, and technological unemployment.
Annual summary of 2019 gwern.net newsletters, selecting my best writings, the best 2019 links by topic, and the best books/movies/anime I saw in 2019, with some general discussion of the year and the 2010s, and an intellectual autobiography of the past decade.
Annual summary of 2018 gwern.net newsletters, selecting my best writings, the best 2018 links by topic, and the best books/movies/anime I saw in 2018, with some general discussion of the year.
GPT-3, announced by OpenAI in May 2020, is the largest neural network ever trained, by over an order of magnitude. Trained on Internet text data, it is the successor to GPT-2, which surprised everyone by its natural language understanding & generation ability. GPT-3 is even more surprising in that this vast increase in size did not run into diminishing returns, as many expected, but the benefits of scale continued to happen as forecasted by OpenAI. These benefits were not merely learning more facts & text than GPT-2, but qualitatively distinct & surprising in showing meta-learning: while GPT-2 learned how to do common natural language tasks like text summarization, GPT-3 instead learned how to follow directions and learn new tasks from a few examples. (As a result, GPT-3 outputs & interaction are more fascinating & human-like than GPT-2.)
While the immediate applications of GPT-3, like my poetry or humor writings, are nice, the short-term implications of GPT-3 are much more important.
First, while GPT-3 is expensive by conventional DL standards, it is cheap by scientific/commercial/military/government budget standards, and the results indicate that models could be made much larger. Second, models can also be made much more powerful, as GPT is an old approach known to be flawed in both minor & major ways, and far from an ‘ideal’ Transformer. Third, GPT-3’s capabilities come from learning on raw (unsupervised) data; that has long been one of the weakest areas of DL, holding back progress in other areas like reinforcement learning or robotics. Models like GPT-3 suggest that large unsupervised models will be vital components of future DL systems, as they can be ‘plugged into’ systems to immediately provide understanding of the world, humans, natural language, and reasoning.
The meta-learning has a longer-term implication: it is a demonstration of the blessings of scale, where problems with simple neural networks vanish, and they become more powerful, more generalizable, more human-like when simply made very large & trained on very large datasets with very large compute—even though those properties are believed to require complicated architectures & fancy algorithms (and this perceived need drives much research). Unsupervised models benefit from this, as training on large corpuses like Internet-scale text present a myriad of difficult problems to solve; this is enough to drive meta-learning despite GPT not being designed for meta-learning in any way. (This family of phenomena is perhaps driven by neural networks functioning as ensembles of many sub-networks with them all averaging out to an Occam’s razor, which for small data & models, learn superficial or memorized parts of the data, but can be forced into true learning by making the problems hard & rich enough.)
The blessings of scale in turn support a radical theory: an old AI paradigm held by a few pioneers in connectionism (early artificial neural network research) and by more recent deep learning researchers, the scaling hypothesis. The scaling hypothesis regards the blessings of scale as the secret of AGI: intelligence is ‘just’ simple neural units & learning algorithms applied to diverse experiences at a (currently) unreachable scale. As increasing computational resources permit running such algorithms at the necessary scale, the neural networks will get ever more intelligent.
When? Estimates of Moore’s law-like progress curves decades ago by pioneers like Hans Moravec indicated that it would take until the 2010s for the sufficiently-cheap compute for tiny insect-level prototype systems to be available, and the 2020s for the first sub-human systems to become feasible, and these forecasts are holding up. (Despite this vindication, the scaling hypothesis is so unpopular an idea, and difficult to prove in advance rather than as a fait accompli, that while the GPT-3 results finally drew some public notice after OpenAI enabled limited public access & people could experiment with it live, it is unlikely that many entities will modify their research philosophies, much less kick off an ‘arms race’.)
More concerningly, GPT-3’s scaling curves, unpredicted meta-learning, and success on various anti-AI challenges suggests that in terms of futurology, AI researchers’ forecasts are an emperor sans garments: they have no coherent model of how AI progress happens or why GPT-3 was possible or what specific achievements should cause alarm, where intelligence comes from, and do not learn from any falsified predictions. Their primary concerns appear to be supporting the status quo, placating public concern, and remaining respectable. As such, their comments on AI risk are meaningless: they would make the same public statements if the scaling hypothesis were true or not.
Depending on what investments are made into scaling DL, and how fast compute grows, the 2020s should be quite interesting—sigmoid or singularity?
I continue my AI poetry generation experiments with OpenAI’s 2020 GPT-3, which is 116× larger, and much more powerful, than the 2019 GPT-2. GPT-3, however, is not merely a quantitative tweak yielding “GPT-2 but better”—it is qualitatively different, exhibiting eerie runtime learning capabilities allowing even the raw model, with zero finetuning, to “meta-learn” many textual tasks purely by example or instruction. One does not train or program GPT-3 in a normal way, but one engages in dialogue and writes prompts to teach GPT-3 what one wants.
Experimenting through the OpenAI Beta API in June 2020, I find that GPT-3 does not just match my finetuned GPT-2-1.5b-poetry for poem-writing quality, but exceeds it, while being versatile in handling poetry, Tom Swifty puns, science fiction, dialogue like Turing’s Turing-test dialogue, literary style parodies… As the pièce de résistance, I recreate Stanislaw Lem’s Cyberiad’s “Trurl’s Electronic Bard” poetry using GPT-3. (Along the way, I document instances of how the BPE text encoding unnecessarily damagesGPT-3’s performance on a variety of tasks, how to best elicit the highest-quality responses, common errors people make in using GPT-3, and test out GPT-3’s improvements in NN weak points like logic or commonsense knowledge.)
GPT-3’s samples are not just close to human level: they are creative, witty, deep, meta, and often beautiful. They demonstrate an ability to handle abstractions, like style parodies, I have not seen in GPT-2 at all. Chatting with GPT-3 feels uncannily like chatting with a human. I was impressed by the results reported in the GPT-3 paper, and after spending a week trying it out, I remain impressed.
This page records GPT-3 samples I generated in my explorations, and thoughts on how to use GPT-3 and its remaining weaknesses. I hope you enjoy them even a tenth as much as I enjoyed testing GPT-3 and watching the completions scroll across my screen.
Sidenotes/margin notes are a typographic convention which improves on footnotes & endnotes by instead putting the notes in the page margin to let the reader instantly read them without needing to refer back and forth to the end of the document (endnotes) or successive pages (footnotes spilling over).
They are particularly useful for web pages, where ‘footnotes’ are de facto endnotes, and clicking back and forth to endnotes is a pain for readers. (Footnote variants, like “floating footnotes” which pop up on mouse hover, reduce the reader’s effort but don’t eliminate it.)
However, they are not commonly used, perhaps because web browsers until relatively recently made it hard to implement sidenotes easily & reliably. Tufte-CSS has popularized the idea and since then, there has been a proliferation of slightly variant approaches. I review some of the available implementations.
For general users, I recommend Tufte-CSS: it is fast & simple (using only compile-time generation of sidenotes, rendered by static HTML/CSS), popular, and easy to integrate into most website workflows. For heavy footnote users or users who want a drop-in, runtime Javascript-based solutions like sidenotes.js may be more useful.
The enduring phenomenon of ‘holy wars’ in computing, such as the bitterness around the prolonged Python 2 to Python 3 migration, are not due to mere pettiness or love of conflict, but because they are a coordination problem: dominant platforms enjoy strong network effects, such as reduced ‘bitrot’ as it is regularly used & maintained by many users, and can inflict a mirror-image ‘bitcreep’ on other platforms which gradually are neglected and begin to bitrot because of the dominant platform.
The outright negative effect of bitcreep mean that holdouts do not just cost early adopters the possible network effects, they also greatly reduce the value of a given thing, and may cause the early adopters to be actually worse off and more miserable on a daily basis. Given the extent to which holdouts have benefited from the community, holdout behavior is perceived as parasitic and immoral behavior by adopters, while holdouts in turn deny any moral obligation and resent the methods that adopters use to increase adoption (such as, in the absence of formal controls, informal ones like bullying).
Perhaps if we explicitly understand ‘holy wars’ as coordination problems, we can avoid the worst excesses and tap into knowledge about the topic to better manage things like language migrations. [Keywords: technology, sociology, Python]
To expand the ABC GPT-2 model to cover a wider variety of musical genres, I turn to the next-most compact widespread music encoding format: MIDI. There are hundreds of thousands of MIDIs which can be decompiled to ABC format, averaging ~10k BPEs—within GPT-2-117M’s feasible context window when trained on TPUs (which permit training of context windows up to 30k wide).
We compile the ABC from before and 2 large MIDI datasets, and convert to ABC, yielding ~453k usable ABC-MIDI musical files (~5.1GB of text). We trained January–April 2020 on our TPU swarm (with many interruptions), achieving a final loss of ~0.2 (underfit).
Sampling from the final model is hit-or-miss as it is prone to the likelihood repetition trap and it generates instruments one-by-one so it is common for instruments to be cut off or otherwise broken during sampling (indicating that sampling is increasingly a bigger problem than training for long-range sequence modeling). However, successful pieces are possible, and are musically far more diverse than the folk ABC corpus, with many pleasingly complex samples.
Standard language generation neural network models, like GPT-2, are trained via likelihood training to imitate human text corpuses. Generated text suffers from persistent flaws like repetition, due to myopic generation word-by-word, and cannot improve on the training data because they are trained to predict ‘realistic’ completions of the training data.
A proposed alternative is to use reinforcement learning to train the NNs, to encourage global properties like coherence & lack of repetition, and potentially improve over the original corpus’s average quality. Preference learning trains a reward function on human ratings, and uses that as the ‘environment’ for a blackbox DRL algorithm like PPO.
OpenAI released a codebase implementing this dual-model preference learning approach for textual generation, based on GPT-2. Having previously used GPT-2 for poetry & music generation, I experimented with GPT-2 preference learning for unconditional music and poetry generation.
I found that preference learning seemed to work better for music than poetry, and seemed to reduce the presence of repetition artifacts, but the results, at n≅7,400 ratings compiled over 23 iterations of training+sampling November 2019–January 2020, are not dramatically better than alternative improvements like scaling up models or more thorough data-cleaning or more stringent sample curation. My blind ratings using n≅200 comparisons showed no large advantage for the RL-tuned samples (winning only 93 of 210 comparisons, or 46%).
This may be due to insufficient ratings, bad hyperparameters, or not using samples generated with common prefixes, but I suspect it’s the former, as some NLP tasks in Ziegler et al 2019 required up to 60k ratings for good performance, and the reward model appeared to achieve poor performance & succumb to adversarial examples easily.
Working with it, I suspect that preference learning is unnecessarily sample-inefficient & data-inefficient, and that the blackbox reinforcement learning approach is inferior to directly using the reward model to optimize text samples, and propose two major architectural overhauls: have the reward model directly model the implied ranking of every datapoint, and drop the agent model entirely in favor of backprop-powered gradient ascent which optimizes sequences to maximize the reward model’s output.
We create and release PALM: the PALM Anime Locator Model. PALM is a pretrained anime hand detector/localization neural network, and 3 sets of accompanying anime hand datasets:
a dataset of 5,382 anime-style Danbooru2019 images annotated with the locations of 14,394 hands
This labeled dataset is used to train a YOLOv3 model to detect hands in anime.
a second dataset of 96,534 hands cropped from the Danbooru2019 dataset using the PALM YOLO model
a cleaned version of #2, consisting of 58,536 hand crops upscaled to >=512px
Hand detection can be used to clean images (eg remove face images with any hands in the way), or to generate datasets of just hands (as a form of data augmentation for GANs), to generate reference datasets for artists, or for other purposes.
Random sample of upscaled subset of Danbooru2019 hands
Subreddit for discussing AI, machine learning, or deep learning approaches involving big numbers: billions of parameters, millions of n, petaflops, etc. eg GPT-3. Most research is conducted at much smaller scale; this subreddit is for research analogous to ‘high energy physics’, requiring specialized approaches, large investments, consortium, etc.
Topics: How? Who? Why do they work? What are they good for? What resources are available? Who will pay & how? What is the future of such approaches? What global consequences will there be?
This page is a changelog for Gwern.net: a monthly reverse chronological list of recent major writings/changes/additions.
Following my writing can be a little difficult because it is often so incremental. So every month, in addition to my regular /r/Gwern subreddit submissions, I write up reasonably-interesting changes and send it out to the mailing list in addition to a compilation of links & reviews (archives).
A subreddit for posting links of interest and also for announcing updates to gwern.net (which can be used as a RSS feed). Submissions are categorized similar to the monthly newsletter and typically will be collated there.
“Language Models are Few-Shot Learners”, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Dario Amodei (2020-05-28):
Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions—something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do.
Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10× more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3’s few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora.
Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general.
Natural language processing tasks, such as question answering, machine translation, reading comprehension, and summarization, are typically approached with supervised learning on task-specific datasets.
We demonstrate that language models begin to learn these tasks without any explicit supervision when trained on a new dataset of millions of webpages called WebText. When conditioned on a document plus questions, the answers generated by the language model reach 55 F1 on the CoQA dataset—matching or exceeding the performance of 3 out of 4 baseline systems without using the 127,000+ training examples.
The capacity of the language model is essential to the success of zero-shot task transfer and increasing it improves performance in a log-linear fashion across tasks. Our largest model, GPT-2, is a 1.5B parameter Transformer that achieves state of the art results on 7 out of 8 tested language modeling datasets in a zero-shot setting but still underfits WebText. Samples from the model reflect these improvements and contain coherent paragraphs of text.
These findings suggest a promising path towards building language processing systems which learn to perform tasks from their naturally occurring demonstrations.
Compared to GPT-2, GPT-3 improves performance on character-level tasks like rhyming, alliteration, punning, anagrams or permutations, acrostic poems, and arithmetic less than expected, despite being very good at many other closely-related kinds of writings like satire.
Why? A plausible explanation is an obscure technical detail: as a performance optimization, GPT does not see characters but sub-word-chunks called “byte-pair encodings” (BPEs). Because GPTs never see characters but opaque partial-words, which vary chaotically based on the specific word and even the surrounding context, they are unable to easily learn about character-level aspects of language, like similar spellings or sounds, and are forced to learn relationships much more indirectly, like by brute-force memorizing of pairs of words.
Some experiments with reformatting GPT-3’s poorest-performing tasks to avoid inconsistent BPE encodings of strings shows small to large performance gains, consistent with this theory.
The GPT-3 neural network is so large a model in terms of power and dataset that it exhibits qualitatively different behavior: you do not apply it to a fixed set of tasks which were in the training dataset, requiring retraining on additional data if one wants to handle a new task (as one would have to retrain GPT-2); instead, you interact with it, expressing any task in terms of natural language descriptions, requests, and examples, tweaking the prompt until it “understands” & it meta-learns the new task based on the high-level abstractions it learned from the pretraining.
This is a rather different way of using a DL model, and it’s better to think of it as a new kind of programming, where the prompt is now a “program” which programs GPT-3 to do new things.
A decompiler is a computer program that takes an executable file as input, and attempts to create a high level source file which can be recompiled successfully. It is therefore the opposite of a compiler, which takes a source file and makes an executable. Decompilers are usually unable to perfectly reconstruct the original source code, and as such, will frequently produce obfuscated code. Nonetheless, decompilers remain an important tool in the reverse engineering of computer software.
In February 2019, following up on my 2015–2016 text-generation experiments with char-RNNs, I experiment with the cutting-edge Transformer NN architecture for language modeling & text generation. Using OpenAI’s GPT-2-117M (117M) model pre-trained on a large Internet corpus and nshepperd’s finetuning code, I retrain GPT-2-117M on a large (117MB) Project Gutenberg poetry corpus. I demonstrate how to train 2 variants: “GPT-2-poetry”, trained on the poems as a continuous stream of text, and “GPT-2-poetry-prefix”, with each line prefixed with the metadata of the PG book it came from. In May 2019, I trained the next-largest GPT-2, GPT-2-345M, similarly, for a further quality boost in generated poems. In October 2019, I retrained GPT-2-117M on a Project Gutenberg corpus with improved formatting, and combined it with a contemporary poem dataset based on Poetry Foundation’swebsite. .> With just a few GPU-days on 1080ti GPUs, GPT-2-117M finetuning can produce high-quality poetry which is more thematically consistent than my char-RNN poems, capable of modeling subtle features like rhyming, and sometimes even a pleasure to read. I list the many possible ways to improve poem generation and further approach human-level poems. For the highest-quality AI poetry to date, see my followup page, “GPT-3 Creative Writing”.
In November 2019, I experimented with training a GPT-2 neural net model to generate folk music in the high-level ABC music text format, following previous work in 2016 which used a char-RNN trained on a ‘The Session’ dataset. A GPT-2 hypothetically can improve on an RNN by better global coherence & copying of patterns, without problems with the hidden-state bottleneck.
I encountered problems with the standard GPT-2 model’s encoding of text which damaged results, but after fixing that, I successfully trained it on n = 205,304 ABC music pieces taken from The Session & ABCnotation.com. The resulting music samples are in my opinion quite pleasant. (A similar model was later retrained by Geerlings & Meroño-Peñuela 2020.)
The ABC folk model & dataset are available for download, and I provide for listening selected music samples as well as medleys of random samples from throughout training.
We followed the ABC folk model with an ABC-MIDI model: a dataset of 453k ABC pieces decompiled from MIDI pieces, which fit into GPT-2-117M with an expanded context window when trained on TPUs. The MIDI pieces are far more diverse and challenging, and GPT-2 underfits and struggles to produce valid samples but when sampling succeeds, it can generate even better musical samples.
Deep learning for computer revision relies on large annotated datasets. Classification/categorization has benefited from the creation of ImageNet, which classifies 1m photos into 1000 categories. But classification/categorization is a coarse description of an image which limits application of classifiers, and there is no comparably large dataset of images with many tags or labels which would allow learning and detecting much richer information about images. Such a dataset would ideally be >1m images with at least 10 descriptive tags each which can be publicly distributed to all interested researchers, hobbyists, and organizations. There are currently no such public datasets, as ImageNet, Birds, Flowers, and MS COCO fall short either on image or tag count or restricted distribution. I suggest that the “image -boorus” be used. The image boorus are longstanding web databases which host large numbers of images which can be ‘tagged’ or labeled with an arbitrary number of textual descriptions; they were developed for and are most popular among fans of anime, who provide detailed annotations.
The best known booru, with a focus on quality, is Danbooru. We provide a torrent/rsync mirror which contains ~3tb of 3.69m images with 108m tag instances (of 392k defined tags, ~29/image) covering Danbooru from 2005-05-24–2019-12-31 (final ID: #3,734,659), providing the image files & a JSON export of the metadata. We also provide a smaller torrent of SFW images downscaled to 512×512px JPGs (295GB; 2,828,400 images) for convenience.
Our hope is that a Danbooru2019 dataset can be used for rich large-scale classification/tagging & learned embeddings, test out the transferability of existing computer vision techniques (primarily developed using photographs) to illustration/anime-style images, provide an archival backup for the Danbooru community, feed back metadata improvements & corrections, and serve as a testbed for advanced techniques such as conditional image generation or style transfer.
Subscription page for the monthly gwern.net newsletter. There are monthly updates, which will include summaries of projects I’ve worked on that month (the same as the changelog), collations of links or discussions from my subreddit, and book/movie reviews. You can also browse the archives since December 2013.
Char-RNNs are unsupervised generative models which learn to mimic text sequences. I suggest extending char-RNNs with inline metadata such as genre or author prefixed to each line of input, allowing for better & more efficient metadata, and more controllable sampling of generated output by feeding in desired metadata. A 2015 experiment using torch-rnn on a set of ~30 Project Gutenberg e-books (1 per author) to train a large char-RNN shows that a char-RNN can learn to remember metadata such as authors, learn associated prose styles, and often generate text visibly similar to that of a specified author.
More successfully, I experiment in 2019 with a recently-developed alternative to char-RNNs, the Transformer NN architecture, by finetuning training OpenAI’s GPT-2-117M Transformer model on a much larger (117MB) Project Gutenberg poetry corpus using both unlabeled lines & lines with inline metadata (the source book). The generated poetry is much better. And GPT-3 is better still.
The Poetry Foundation is a Chicago-based American foundation created to promote poetry in the wider culture. It was formed from Poetry magazine, which it continues to publish, with a 2003 gift of $200 million from philanthropist Ruth Lilly.
…Black is GPT-2. Its excuse [for this chess blunder] is that it’s a text prediction program with no concept of chess. As far as it knows, it’s trying to predict short alphanumeric strings like “e2e4” or “Nb7”. Nobody told it this represents a board game. It doesn’t even have a concept of 2D space that it could use to understand such a claim. But it still captured my rook! Embarrassing!…Last month, I asked him if he thought GPT-2 could play chess. I wondered if he could train it on a corpus of chess games written in standard notation (where, for example, e2e4 means “move the pawn at square e2 to square e4”). There are literally millions of games written up like this. GPT-2 would learn to predict the next string of text, which would correspond to the next move in the chess game. Then you would prompt it with a chessboard up to a certain point, and it would predict how the chess masters who had produced its training data would continue the game – ie make its next move using the same heuristics they would. Gwern handed the idea to his collaborator Shawn Presser, who had a working GPT-2 chess engine running within a week:…You can play against GPT-2 yourself by following the directions in the last tweet, though it won’t be much of a challenge for anyone better than I am.
…What does this imply? I’m not sure (and maybe it will imply more if someone manages to make it actually good). It was already weird to see something with no auditory qualia learn passable poetic meter. It’s even weirder to see something with no concept of space learn to play chess. Is any of this meaningful? How impressed should we be that the same AI can write poems, compose music, and play chess, without having been designed for any of those tasks? I still don’t know.
While training a GPT-2-117M on a folk music corpus written in ABC format, persistent syntax errors kept being generated by an otherwise-high-quality model: random spaces would be generated, rendering a music piece either erroneous or lower-quality. Why? It seems to be some issue with the GPT BPE encoder handling of spaces which makes it difficult to emit the right space-separated characters. We found that ABC does not actually require spaces, and we simply removed all spaces from the corpus—noticeably improving quality of generated pieces.
Generating symbolic music with language models is a promising research area, with potential applications in automated music composition. Recent work shows that Transformer architectures can learn to generate compelling four-instrument scores from large MIDI datasets. In this paper, we re-train the small (117M) GPT-2 model with a large dataset in ABC notation, and generate samples of single-instrument folk music. Our BLEU and ROUGE based quantitative, and survey based qualitative, evaluations suggest that ABC notation is learned with syntactical and semantic correctness, and that samples contain robust and believable n-grams.
This work applies natural language modeling to generate plausible strategic moves in the ancient game of Go. We train the Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT-2) to mimic the style of Go champions as archived in Smart Game Format (SGF), which offers a text description of move sequences. The trained model further generates valid but previously unseen strategies for Go. Because GPT-2 preserves punctuation and spacing, the raw output of the text generator provides inputs to game visualization and creative patterns, such as the Sabaki project’s game engine using auto-replays. Results demonstrate that language modeling can capture both the sequencing format of championship Go games and their strategic formations. Compared to random game boards, the GPT-2 fine-tuning shows efficient opening move sequences favoring corner play over less advantageous center and side play. Game generation as a language modeling task offers novel approaches to more than 40 other board games where historical text annotation provides training data (e.g., Amazons & Connect 4/6).
This work demonstrates that natural language transformers can support more generic strategic modeling, particularly for text-archived games. In addition to learning natural language skills, the abstract transformer architecture can generate meaningful moves on a chessboard. With further fine-tuning, the transformer learns complex gameplay by training on 2.8 million chess games in Portable Game Notation. After 30,000 training steps, OpenAI’s Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT-2) optimizes weights for 774 million parameters. This fine-tuned Chess Transformer generates plausible strategies and displays game formations identifiable as classic openings, such as English or the Slav Exchange. Finally, in live play, the novel model demonstrates a human-to-transformer interface that correctly filters illegal moves and provides a novel method to challenge the transformer’s chess strategies. We anticipate future work will build on this transformer’s promise, particularly in other strategy games where features can capture the underlying complex rule syntax from simple but expressive player annotations.
