- See Also
-
Links
- “Controversies of Carbon Dioxide Removal”, Anderson et al 2023
- “A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt”, Johnson et al 2022
- “Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Cherry et al 2022
- “The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, Peters 2021
- “Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, Bullock et al 2021
- “Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies Said the United States Must Study Technologies That Would Artificially Cool the Planet by Reflecting Away Some Sunlight, Citing the Lack of Progress Fighting Global Warming.”, Flavelle 2021
- “Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, Sciences 2021
- “Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, Plumer & Flavelle 2021
- “Viability of Greenhouse Gas Removal via Artificial Addition of Volcanic Ash to the Ocean”, Longman et al 2020
- “Carbon Offsets Burning: A Major Fire in Oregon Illustrates the Challenges of Managing Forest Carbon Permanence”, Herbert et al 2020
- “Potential for Large-Scale CO2 Removal via Enhanced Rock Weathering With Croplands”, Beerling et al 2020
- “Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Rock Weathering Holds Promise for Mitigating Climate Change: Large-Scale Removal of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Might Be Achieved through Enhanced Rock Weathering. It Now Seems That This Approach Is As Promising As Other Strategies, in Terms of Cost and CO2-Removal Potential”, Lehmann & Possinger 2020
- “Pulling Carbon from the Sky Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Carbon Dioxide Removal Is Becoming a Serious Proposition. But It Is Not a Substitute for Aggressive Action to Cut Emissions”, Nature 2020
- “Spreading Rock Dust on Fields Could Remove Vast Amounts of CO2 from Air: It May Be Best Near-Term Way to Remove CO2, Say Scientists, but Cutting Fossil Fuel Use Remains Critical”, Carrington 2020
- “Climate-Driven Risks to the Climate Mitigation Potential of Forests”, Anderegg et al 2020
- “Negative Emissions—Part 2: Costs, Potentials and Side Effects”, Fuss et al 2020
- “We Need To Take CO2 Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO2⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, Orbuch 2020
- “A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere”, Keith et al 2018
- “Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis”, Minx et al 2018
- “Negative Emissions—Part 3: Innovation and Upscaling”, Nemet et al 2018
- “Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering”, Field et al 2018
- “Policy and Innovation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies”, Nemet 2007
- Wikipedia
- Miscellaneous
- Link Bibliography
See Also
Links
“Controversies of Carbon Dioxide Removal”, Anderson et al 2023
“A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt”, Johnson et al 2022
A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt
“Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Cherry et al 2022
“The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, Peters 2021
“Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, Bullock et al 2021
Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining
“Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies Said the United States Must Study Technologies That Would Artificially Cool the Planet by Reflecting Away Some Sunlight, Citing the Lack of Progress Fighting Global Warming.”, Flavelle 2021
“Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, Sciences 2021
Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance
“Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, Plumer & Flavelle 2021
“Viability of Greenhouse Gas Removal via Artificial Addition of Volcanic Ash to the Ocean”, Longman et al 2020
Viability of greenhouse gas removal via artificial addition of volcanic ash to the ocean
“Carbon Offsets Burning: A Major Fire in Oregon Illustrates the Challenges of Managing Forest Carbon Permanence”, Herbert et al 2020
“Potential for Large-Scale CO2 Removal via Enhanced Rock Weathering With Croplands”, Beerling et al 2020
Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands
“Removal of Atmospheric CO2 by Rock Weathering Holds Promise for Mitigating Climate Change: Large-Scale Removal of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Might Be Achieved through Enhanced Rock Weathering. It Now Seems That This Approach Is As Promising As Other Strategies, in Terms of Cost and CO2-Removal Potential”, Lehmann & Possinger 2020
“Pulling Carbon from the Sky Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Carbon Dioxide Removal Is Becoming a Serious Proposition. But It Is Not a Substitute for Aggressive Action to Cut Emissions”, Nature 2020
“Spreading Rock Dust on Fields Could Remove Vast Amounts of CO2 from Air: It May Be Best Near-Term Way to Remove CO2, Say Scientists, but Cutting Fossil Fuel Use Remains Critical”, Carrington 2020
“Climate-Driven Risks to the Climate Mitigation Potential of Forests”, Anderegg et al 2020
Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests
“Negative Emissions—Part 2: Costs, Potentials and Side Effects”, Fuss et al 2020
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
“We Need To Take CO2 Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO2⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, Orbuch 2020
“A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere”, Keith et al 2018
“Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis”, Minx et al 2018
“Negative Emissions—Part 3: Innovation and Upscaling”, Nemet et al 2018
“Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering”, Field et al 2018
Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering
“Policy and Innovation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies”, Nemet 2007
Wikipedia
Miscellaneous
-
https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2020/07/21/carbon-negative-transform-to-net-zero/
: -
https://carbonplan.org/research/forest-offsets
:View External Link:
-
https://spectrum.ieee.org/iron-powder-passes-first-industrial-test-as-renewable-co2free-fuel
: -
https://stripe.com/blog/first-negative-emissions-purchases
: -
https://terraformindustries.wordpress.com/2024/04/01/terraform-makes-carbon-neutral-natural-gas/
: -
https://www.additionalventures.org/initiatives/climate-action/oae-research-award/
-
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2019.00009/full
-
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/20/can-carbon-dioxide-removal-save-the-world
-
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/10/23/the-great-cash-for-carbon-hustle
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/12/magazine/climeworks-business-climate-change.html
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/climate/carbon-capture-tax-break.html
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/31/climate/is-carbon-capture-here.html
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/09/climate/direct-air-capture-carbon.html
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/02/climate/sun-shade-climate-geoengineering.html
-
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/switching-out-fossil-fuel-feedstocks
: -
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/its-time-to-engineer-the-sky/
-
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/11/whaling-whales-food-krill-iron/620604/
-
https://www.vox.com/recode/22394867/elon-musk-foundation-philanthropy-xprize-tesla-spacex
-
https://www.wired.com/story/big-business-burying-carbon-dioxide-capture-storage/
:View External Link:
https://www.wired.com/story/big-business-burying-carbon-dioxide-capture-storage/
-
https://www.wired.com/story/britain-crown-estate-ocean-empire/
:View External Link:
https://www.wired.com/story/britain-crown-estate-ocean-empire/
-
https://www.wired.com/story/rock-dust-soak-up-carbon-emissions-climate-experiment/
: -
https://www.wired.com/story/the-quest-to-trap-carbon-in-stone-and-beat-climate-change/
: -
https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/liquified-carbon-emissions-storage-ships-4f4f6e84
:
Link Bibliography
-
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022EF002883
: “A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt”, -
2022-cherry.pdf
: “Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, -
https://www.fastcompany.com/90659827/the-bootleg-fire-is-burning-through-trees-that-are-being-used-as-carbon-offsets
: “The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, -
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/18/climate/carbon-removal-technology.html
: “Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, -
https://www.orbuch.com/carbon-removal/
: “We Need To Take CO2 Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO2⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, -
2007-nemet.pdf
: “Policy and Innovation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies”,