‘carbon capture’ tag

See Also
Links
Miscellaneous
Link Bibliography

[Warning: JavaScript Disabled!]

[For support of key website features (link annotation popups/popovers & transclusions, collapsible sections, backlinks, tablesorting, image zooming, sidenotes etc), you must enable JavaScript.]

See Also

Parent

Links

“Controversies of Carbon Dioxide Removal”, Anderson et al 2023

Controversies of carbon dioxide removal

“A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt”, Johnson et al 2022

A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt

“Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Cherry et al 2022

Climate cooperation in the shadow of solar geoengineering: an experimental investigation of the moral hazard conjecture

“The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, Peters 2021

The Bootleg fire is burning through trees that are being used as carbon offsets: One of the dangers of using trees as offsets is that they can suddenly and catastrophically release all their stored carbon

“Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining”, Bullock et al 2021

Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Waste Materials From Metal and Diamond Mining

“Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies Said the United States Must Study Technologies That Would Artificially Cool the Planet by Reflecting Away Some Sunlight, Citing the Lack of Progress Fighting Global Warming.”, Flavelle 2021

Should We Block the Sun? Scientists Say the Time Has Come to Study It. The National Academies said the United States must study technologies that would artificially cool the planet by reflecting away some sunlight, citing the lack of progress fighting global warming.

“Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance”, Sciences 2021

Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance

“Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, Plumer & Flavelle 2021

Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A surge of corporate money could soon transform carbon removal from science fiction to reality. But there are risks: The very idea could offer industry an excuse to maintain dangerous habits.

“Viability of Greenhouse Gas Removal via Artificial Addition of Volcanic Ash to the Ocean”, Longman et al 2020

Viability of greenhouse gas removal via artificial addition of volcanic ash to the ocean

“Carbon Offsets Burning: A Major Fire in Oregon Illustrates the Challenges of Managing Forest Carbon Permanence”, Herbert et al 2020

Carbon offsets burning: A major fire in Oregon illustrates the challenges of managing forest carbon permanence

“Potential for Large-Scale CO₂ Removal via Enhanced Rock Weathering With Croplands”, Beerling et al 2020

Potential for large-scale CO₂ removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands

“Removal of Atmospheric CO₂ by Rock Weathering Holds Promise for Mitigating Climate Change: Large-Scale Removal of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere Might Be Achieved through Enhanced Rock Weathering. It Now Seems That This Approach Is As Promising As Other Strategies, in Terms of Cost and CO₂-Removal Potential”, Lehmann & Possinger 2020

Removal of atmospheric CO₂ by rock weathering holds promise for mitigating climate change: Large-scale removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere might be achieved through enhanced rock weathering. It now seems that this approach is as promising as other strategies, in terms of cost and CO₂-removal potential

“Pulling Carbon from the Sky Is Necessary but Not Sufficient: Carbon Dioxide Removal Is Becoming a Serious Proposition. But It Is Not a Substitute for Aggressive Action to Cut Emissions”, Nature 2020

Pulling carbon from the sky is necessary but not sufficient: Carbon dioxide removal is becoming a serious proposition. But it is not a substitute for aggressive action to cut emissions

“Spreading Rock Dust on Fields Could Remove Vast Amounts of CO₂ from Air: It May Be Best Near-Term Way to Remove CO₂, Say Scientists, but Cutting Fossil Fuel Use Remains Critical”, Carrington 2020

Spreading rock dust on fields could remove vast amounts of CO₂ from air: It may be best near-term way to remove CO₂, say scientists, but cutting fossil fuel use remains critical

“Climate-Driven Risks to the Climate Mitigation Potential of Forests”, Anderegg et al 2020

Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests

“Negative Emissions—Part 2: Costs, Potentials and Side Effects”, Fuss et al 2020

Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects

“We Need To Take CO₂ Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO₂⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, Orbuch 2020

We Need To Take CO₂ Out Of The Sky: To keep below two degrees, we’ll need to dramatically reduce current emissions and simultaneously remove 10–15 gigatons of CO₂⁄yr from the atmosphere by 2050. Read on for what that means, why, and how we might do it.

“A Process for Capturing CO₂ from the Atmosphere”, Keith et al 2018

A Process for Capturing CO₂ from the Atmosphere

“Negative Emissions—Part 1: Research Landscape and Synthesis”, Minx et al 2018

Negative emissions—Part 1: Research landscape and synthesis

“Negative Emissions—Part 3: Innovation and Upscaling”, Nemet et al 2018

Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling

“Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering”, Field et al 2018

Increasing Arctic Sea Ice Albedo Using Localized Reversible Geoengineering

“Policy and Innovation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies”, Nemet 2007

Policy and Innovation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies

Wikipedia

Carbon dioxide removal
Carbon offset⁠:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_offset
Carbonate-silicate cycle⁠:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonate%E2%80%93silicate_cycle
Enhanced weathering
Olivine § Uses⁠:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivine#Uses
Stripe (company)⁠:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stripe_%28company%29

Miscellaneous

Link Bibliography

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2022EF002883: “A Controlled Experiment of Surface Albedo Modification to Reduce Ice Melt”, D. Johnson, A. Manzara, L. A. Field, D. R. Chamberlin, A. Sholtz

link-bibliography
2022-cherry.pdf: “Climate Cooperation in the Shadow of Solar Geoengineering: an Experimental Investigation of the Moral Hazard Conjecture”, Todd L. Cherry, Stephan Kroll, David M. McEvoy, David Campoverde, Juan Moreno-Cruz

link-bibliography
https://www.fastcompany.com/90659827/the-bootleg-fire-is-burning-through-trees-that-are-being-used-as-carbon-offsets: “The Bootleg Fire Is Burning through Trees That Are Being Used As Carbon Offsets: One of the Dangers of Using Trees As Offsets Is That They Can Suddenly and Catastrophically Release All Their Stored Carbon”, Adele Peters

link-bibliography
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/18/climate/carbon-removal-technology.html: “Businesses Aim to Pull Greenhouse Gases From the Air. It’s a Gamble. A Surge of Corporate Money Could Soon Transform Carbon Removal from Science Fiction to Reality. But There Are Risks: The Very Idea Could Offer Industry an Excuse to Maintain Dangerous Habits.”, Brad Plumer, Christopher Flavelle

link-bibliography
https://www.orbuch.com/carbon-removal/: “We Need To Take CO₂ Out Of The Sky: To Keep below Two Degrees, We’ll Need to Dramatically Reduce Current Emissions and Simultaneously Remove 10–15 Gigatons of CO₂⁄yr from the Atmosphere by 2050. Read on for What That Means, Why, and How We Might Do It.”, Ryan Orbuch

link-bibliography
2007-nemet.pdf: “Policy and Innovation in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies”, Gregory Frank Nemet

link-bibliography

[Quote Of The Day]

[Site Of The Day]

[Annotation Of The Day]

[adblock public service announcement]