Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
2 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 16:24 +10 GSK talk contribs (→Verb tense: new shortcut)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 05:00 −1 Remsense talk contribs (→Scrolling lists and collapsible content)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 04:59 +138 Remsense talk contribs (→Scrolling lists and collapsible content: ce!)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 04:57 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: dummy edit and apologies. What I’ve said is probably incorrect and it seems that a previous substantial edit is also a direct quote from Jimbo Wales (and not in the editor’s own words as I said). Thanks.)
1 June 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 23:00 +115 Remsense talk contribs (→Foreign terms: boldly switching term from "foreign" to "non-English" per talk page discussions where it seemed there were no real objections)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 22:22 +7 Remsense talk contribs (→Foreign terms: +shortcut)
- diffhist Religious 18:16 −9 Gwillhickers talk contribs (←Redirected page to Religion) Tag: New redirect
- diffhist Religious 18:15 +8 Gwillhickers talk contribs (←Removed redirect to Religion) Tag: Removed redirect
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:59 +13 Primium talk contribs (→Responsibility for providing citations: added ore-existing shortcut)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:29 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 16:09 −16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Self-revert. I didn’t notice there’s a discussion on talk until someone pinged me just now (this page wasn’t on my watchlist). I want to say that the green emphasis was added because in another discussion a user has misinterpreted the policy by citing what Jimbo said. It’s a long story but I don’t think I’m able to explain it clearly. Anyway I don’t want anymore drama so I’m self-reverting. Thanks everyone for watching...) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 08:50 −1 Remsense talk contribs (→See also)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 22:25 −6 SchreiberBike talk contribs (Small fix)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:22 +19 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:21 +12 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:19 −3 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: ce)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:12 +449 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: ce turned rewrite!)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Manual of Style 06:52 −2 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: (s)?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 06:50 −2 Remsense talk contribs (→Animals, plants, and other organisms: unnecessary bracketing)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
30 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:40 −20 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1226458510 by WhatamIdoing (talk) This is a paraphrase of Jimmy Wales 2002 statement and the notion of reliable sources was not discussed at that time.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:33 +20 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Not a minority of editors) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
29 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:53 +21 Dave souza talk contribs (Undid revision 1226310338 by Dave souza (talk) undo own revert) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:50 −21 Dave souza talk contribs (Reverted edit by Dustfreeworld (talk) to last version by Cambalachero) Tags: Rollback Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:34 +21 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Copied three words from the section below.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Dogma 17:48 +2 Jestuce talk contribs (FIX)
- diffhist m Dogma 17:48 +13 Jestuce talk contribs (Added an ideology to the introduction)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 15:11 −5 Wik6516 talk contribs (Minor rewording) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines 11:53 +381 Ca talk contribs (incorporate User:WhatamIdoing's suggestions) Tag: Visual edit
28 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Shortcut 20:26 +295 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Link boxes: Quantifying commonness) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist m Dialect 18:26 +16 Onel5969 talk contribs (Disambiguating links to Brummie (link changed to Brummie dialect) using DisamAssist.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines 08:48 −364 Ca talk contribs (→Content changes: ce) Tag: Visual edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines 08:39 −873 Ca talk contribs (copyediting, add links) Tag: Visual edit
27 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:46 −15 Cambalachero talk contribs (→Exceptional claims require exceptional sources: Despite the superficial similarities, Wikipedia's Verifiability and actual science are two different fields with their own rules.)