Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
1 June 2024
- diffhist Mindset 11:24 −5 HudecEmil talk contribs (fix broken links in reference)
- diffhist Mindset 11:20 −55 HudecEmil talk contribs (merge history and research)
- diffhist Mindset 11:18 +1,063 HudecEmil talk contribs (criticism with references)
- diffhist Mindset 10:55 +5 HudecEmil talk contribs (grammar)
- diffhist Mindset 10:55 −170 HudecEmil talk contribs (link sex differences in education, concise, join paragraphs)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:31 +16 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Color. Wikipedia:Nobody reads the directions)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:24 −354 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (It seems to me that substantial change was made to the policy by another editor using their own words. I’m not sure it’s what Jimbo Wales’ original statement means. I’m restoring the page to the last stable version (revision 1224068956). Please read this too. Thanks.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist m Jimmy Wales 03:40 +1 Clovermoss talk contribs (Dummy edit to indicate that my previous edit summary is somewhat inaccurate. Appears that Steven Pruitt is the only other article to also have this sort of hatnote. I still think it's worth discussing before outright removal.)
- diffhist Jimmy Wales 03:37 +67 Clovermoss talk contribs (It's fairly common for articles within List of Wikipedia people to have this hatnote. Feel free to start a talk page discussion if you disagree on the merits on whether it should be but I don't think it's a mistake as-is.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Jimmy Wales 03:33 −67 JLCop talk contribs (I think this does not go here) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- diffhist Jimmy Wales 03:32 +108 JLCop talk contribs Tag: Visual edit
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 20:55 +534 Woodroar talk contribs (→Great Barrington Declaration: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 20:20 +243 Saltsjöbaden talk contribs (→Great Barrington Declaration)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 19:35 +361 Firefangledfeathers talk contribs (→Great Barrington Declaration: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 19:30 −17 Saltsjöbaden talk contribs (→Great Barrington Declaration)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 19:29 +2,747 Saltsjöbaden talk contribs (→Great Barrington Declaration: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist The Princess Bride (film) 18:20 −1 Str1977 talk contribs (→Cast)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 07:56 +246 Yr Enw talk contribs (→Irgun: Reply) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 06:47 +307 Alaexis talk contribs (→Irgun: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Aristotle 05:56 0 Omnipaedista talk contribs (style fix per MOS:SECTIONORDER)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 04:49 +122 Sean.hoyland talk contribs (→Irgun: +)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 04:46 +497 Sean.hoyland talk contribs (→Irgun)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 03:46 +535 Fanccr talk contribs (→Irgun: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist m Ad hominem 03:19 +142 Tmusgrove talk contribs (→External links: additional third party reference / examples)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 00:47 +305 The Four Deuces talk contribs (→Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply) Tag: Reply
30 May 2024
- diffhist Jimmy Wales 22:09 +67 The Sharpest Lives talk contribs (feels fair to add in case someone ends up here on accident) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 21:38 0 North8000 talk contribs (→Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: spelling)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 21:37 +409 North8000 talk contribs (Undid revision 1226474334 by Muboshgu (talk) ! ! Undo revert of my post) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 21:21 −409 Muboshgu talk contribs (Reverted edit by North8000 (talk) to last version by DIYeditor) Tags: Rollback Reverted
- diffhist m Carl Sagan 20:47 −35 Egidio24 talk contribs (v2.05 - Fix errors for CW project (Link equal to linktext)) Tag: WPCleaner
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 20:43 +409 North8000 talk contribs (→Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Nearly every definition of "quackery" includes thinks like deliberate misleading, deliberate pretending and fraud. IMO this should not be in the article much less in the lead. The lead should be a summary of the body of the article, and there is nothing about such aspects in the article.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 20:33 +104 DIYeditor talk contribs (→Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:40 −20 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (Undid revision 1226458510 by WhatamIdoing (talk) This is a paraphrase of Jimmy Wales 2002 statement and the notion of reliable sources was not discussed at that time.) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:33 +20 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Not a minority of editors) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist m The Princess Bride (film) 15:25 0 Onionsgreen talk contribs (Undid revision 1226360524 by Cameronmccaleb (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist m The Princess Bride (film) 15:23 0 Onionsgreen talk contribs (Undid revision 1226361094 by Cameronmccaleb (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist The Princess Bride (film) 15:18 −1 Onionsgreen talk contribs Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 12:53 +747 Konanen talk contribs (→Use of contentious labels in lead of an article: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Administrators 12:46 +1,170 Andrybak talk contribs (similar to previous undo: lots of long-standing text got altered (e.g. wording from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/C68-FM-SV); reference WP:INVOLVED got deleted ⇒ Undid revision 1226342607 by Ca (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Administrators 12:36 +1,688 Andrybak talk contribs (Template:policy shortcut got deleted for WP:WHEEL; →Restoration of admin tools: list item "Security of account cannot be established" got deleted + wording established at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/2019 Resysop Criteria (2) changed without discussion ⇒ Undid revision 1226381451 by Ca (talk)) Tag: Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard 08:28 +487 DIYeditor talk contribs (→Need some patient people at Jordan Peterson: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia:Administrators 08:06 −1,688 Ca talk contribs (copyediting) Tags: Reverted Visual edit
- diffhist Bertrand Russell 04:22 +1,479 A. Randomdude0000 talk contribs (Restored revision 1225828989 by Prevenient (talk)) Tags: Twinkle Undo