Wronskian: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎The Wronskian and linear independence: Move a parenthetical remark where it belongs: just after the matter on which it comments, not splitting the introduction of a list of "several extra conditions" from that list
→‎The Wronskian and linear independence: "Peano (1889) observed that if the functions are analytic, then ..." fails verification: the MAA article linked for the "Peano (1889)" citation says this was Bôcher, not Peano. (I hope it's okay to add a footnote citation among the deprecated kind when there's already also a footnote one nearby?)
Line 52: Line 52:


A common misconception is that {{math|''W'' {{=}} 0}} everywhere implies linear dependence, but {{harvtxt|Peano|1889}} pointed out that the functions {{math|''x''<sup>2</sup>}} and {{math|{{!}}''x''{{!}}''{{middot}} x''}} have continuous derivatives and their Wronskian vanishes everywhere, yet they are not linearly dependent in any neighborhood of {{math|0}}. (Peano published his example twice, because the first time he published it, an editor, [[Paul Mansion]], who had written a textbook incorrectly claiming that the vanishing of the Wronskian implies linear dependence, added a footnote to Peano's paper claiming that this result is correct as long as neither function is identically zero. Peano's second paper pointed out that this footnote was nonsense.) There are several extra conditions which ensure that the vanishing of the Wronskian in an interval implies linear dependence.
A common misconception is that {{math|''W'' {{=}} 0}} everywhere implies linear dependence, but {{harvtxt|Peano|1889}} pointed out that the functions {{math|''x''<sup>2</sup>}} and {{math|{{!}}''x''{{!}}''{{middot}} x''}} have continuous derivatives and their Wronskian vanishes everywhere, yet they are not linearly dependent in any neighborhood of {{math|0}}. (Peano published his example twice, because the first time he published it, an editor, [[Paul Mansion]], who had written a textbook incorrectly claiming that the vanishing of the Wronskian implies linear dependence, added a footnote to Peano's paper claiming that this result is correct as long as neither function is identically zero. Peano's second paper pointed out that this footnote was nonsense.) There are several extra conditions which ensure that the vanishing of the Wronskian in an interval implies linear dependence.
{{harvtxt|Peano|1889}} observed that if the functions are [[analytic function|analytic]], then the vanishing of the Wronskian in an interval implies that they are linearly dependent. {{harvtxt|Bôcher|1901}} gave several other conditions for the vanishing of the Wronskian to imply linear dependence; for example, if the Wronskian of {{math|''n''}} functions is identically zero and the {{math|''n''}} Wronskians of {{math|''n'' – 1}} of them do not all vanish at any point then the functions are linearly dependent. {{harvtxt|Wolsson|1989a}} gave a more general condition that together with the vanishing of the Wronskian implies linear dependence.
[[Maxime Bôcher]] observed that if the functions are [[analytic function|analytic]], then the vanishing of the Wronskian in an interval implies that they are linearly dependent.<ref name="PeanoOnWronskians-BocherAnalytic"/> {{harvtxt|Bôcher|1901}} gave several other conditions for the vanishing of the Wronskian to imply linear dependence; for example, if the Wronskian of {{math|''n''}} functions is identically zero and the {{math|''n''}} Wronskians of {{math|''n'' – 1}} of them do not all vanish at any point then the functions are linearly dependent. {{harvtxt|Wolsson|1989a}} gave a more general condition that together with the vanishing of the Wronskian implies linear dependence.


Over fields of positive characteristic ''p'' the Wronskian may vanish even for linearly independent polynomials; for example, the Wronskian of ''x''<sup>''p''</sup> and 1 is identically 0.
Over fields of positive characteristic ''p'' the Wronskian may vanish even for linearly independent polynomials; for example, the Wronskian of ''x''<sup>''p''</sup> and 1 is identically 0.
Line 104: Line 104:


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist|refs=
<ref name="PeanoOnWronskians-BocherAnalytic">{{cite journal |last1=Engdahl |first1=Susannah |last2=Parker |first2=Adam |title=Peano on Wronskians: A Translation |journal=Convergence |date=April 2011 |doi=10.4169/loci003642 |url=https://www.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/peano-on-wronskians-a-translation |accessdate=2020-10-08 |publisher=Mathematical Association of America |quote=The most famous theorem is attributed to Bocher, and states that if the Wronskian of <math>n</math> <em>analytic</em> functions is zero, then the functions are linearly dependent ([B2], [BD]).}}</ref>
}}


== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 01:34, 9 October 2020

In mathematics, the Wronskian (or Wrońskian) is a determinant introduced by Józef Hoene-Wroński (1812) and named by Thomas Muir (1882, Chapter XVIII). It is used in the study of differential equations, where it can sometimes show linear independence in a set of solutions.

Definition

The Wronskian of two differentiable functions f and g is W(f, g) = f g′ – g f .

More generally, for n real- or complex-valued functions f1, . . . , fn, which are n – 1 times differentiable on an interval I, the Wronskian W(f1, . . . , fn) as a function on I is defined by

That is, it is the determinant of the matrix constructed by placing the functions in the first row, the first derivative of each function in the second row, and so on through the (n – 1)th derivative, thus forming a square matrix sometimes called a fundamental matrix.

When the functions fi are solutions of a linear differential equation, the Wronskian can be found explicitly using Abel's identity, even if the functions fi are not known explicitly.

The Wronskian and linear independence

If the functions fi are linearly dependent, then so are the columns of the Wronskian as differentiation is a linear operation, so the Wronskian vanishes. Thus, the Wronskian can be used to show that a set of differentiable functions is linearly independent on an interval by showing that it does not vanish identically. It may, however, vanish at isolated points.[1]

A common misconception is that W = 0 everywhere implies linear dependence, but Peano (1889) pointed out that the functions x2 and |x| · x have continuous derivatives and their Wronskian vanishes everywhere, yet they are not linearly dependent in any neighborhood of 0. (Peano published his example twice, because the first time he published it, an editor, Paul Mansion, who had written a textbook incorrectly claiming that the vanishing of the Wronskian implies linear dependence, added a footnote to Peano's paper claiming that this result is correct as long as neither function is identically zero. Peano's second paper pointed out that this footnote was nonsense.) There are several extra conditions which ensure that the vanishing of the Wronskian in an interval implies linear dependence. Maxime Bôcher observed that if the functions are analytic, then the vanishing of the Wronskian in an interval implies that they are linearly dependent.[2] Bôcher (1901) gave several other conditions for the vanishing of the Wronskian to imply linear dependence; for example, if the Wronskian of n functions is identically zero and the n Wronskians of n – 1 of them do not all vanish at any point then the functions are linearly dependent. Wolsson (1989a) gave a more general condition that together with the vanishing of the Wronskian implies linear dependence.

Over fields of positive characteristic p the Wronskian may vanish even for linearly independent polynomials; for example, the Wronskian of xp and 1 is identically 0.

Application to linear differential equations

In general, for an th order linear differential equation, if solutions are known, the last one can be determined by using the Wronskian.

Consider the second order differential equation in Lagrange's notation

where are known. Let us call the two solutions of the equation and form their Wronskian

Then differentiating and using the fact that obey the above differential equation shows that

Therefore, the Wronskian obeys a simple first order differential equation and can be exactly solved:

where

Now suppose that we know one of the solutions, say . Then, by the definition of the Wronskian, obeys a first order differential equation:

and can be solved exactly (at least in theory).

The method is easily generalized to higher order equations.

Generalized Wronskians

For n functions of several variables, a generalized Wronskian is a determinant of an n by n matrix with entries Di(fj) (with 0 ≤ i < n), where each Di is some constant coefficient linear partial differential operator of order i. If the functions are linearly dependent then all generalized Wronskians vanish. As in the 1 variable case the converse is not true in general: if all generalized Wronskians vanish, this does not imply that the functions are linearly dependent. However, the converse is true in many special cases. For example, if the functions are polynomials and all generalized Wronskians vanish, then the functions are linearly dependent. Roth used this result about generalized Wronskians in his proof of Roth's theorem. For more general conditions under which the converse is valid see Wolsson (1989b).

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Bender, Carl M.; Orszag, Steven A. (1999) [1978], Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory, New York: Springer, p. 9, ISBN 978-0-387-98931-0
  2. ^ Engdahl, Susannah; Parker, Adam (April 2011). "Peano on Wronskians: A Translation". Convergence. Mathematical Association of America. doi:10.4169/loci003642. Retrieved 2020-10-08. The most famous theorem is attributed to Bocher, and states that if the Wronskian of analytic functions is zero, then the functions are linearly dependent ([B2], [BD]).

References