This is a fun little mystery that I stumbled upon a long time ago – in Buzzfeed, of all places – and it has stuck with me ever since. The article (below) does a much better job of explaining this mystery than I could, but he's a short summary:
In 2013, the MIT Data lab did a study on the relative global "fame" of various celebrities and historical figures using data from Wikipedia, including the number of languages each person's article has been translated into.
Standing at number three, sandwiched between "Barrack Barack Obama" and "Confucius" was none other than High School Musical supporting actor Corbin Bleu, with a whopping 193 languages. (For reference, Wikipedia boasts a total of 293 active languages, of which the highest figure on the list – Jesus Christ – claims 214)
Before you go jumping to conclusions, a few things to consider:
Corbin beats out many other figures you'd expect to see on such a list, such as Isaac Newton (No.5), Adolf Hitler (No. 8), or Albert Einstein (No. 10)
Corbin somehow managed to outrank every single other living celebrity, including his much more famous HSM co-stars Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens. The next closest contemporary pop culture figure was Lady Gaga, with 133 pages, at 45th place.
His dominance is confined solely to number of language editions. In terms of actual page views, his stats are relatively modest – he doesn't even rank in the top 100
Corbin Bleu has a relatively modest Twitter following and, to my knowledge, has no unusually large overseas following
According to the article, there doesn't seem to be any pattern with regards to the creation pages to suggest they were the work of bots or some super fan:
A random search of the Bleu Wikipedia page edit histories revealed no common names or IP addresses associated with page edits or creations. Nor were the pages all created at once; they appeared at what seemed to be a fairly random pace over the past 10 years, ever since the English page was created on Jan. 2, 2006, by a user named Damionbak.
Corbin himself has denied any involvement or knowledge of the anomaly:
"What?" Bleu said when BuzzFeed News informed him of his place between the leader of the free world and one of the most important philosophers in the history of human civilization. "Holy shit! Really? I wonder why that is! Are that many people looking me up? What the hell! That's amazing. That's ridiculous, actually. That is unnecessary, but I will definitely put that on my resume."
It's been a few years but I have yet to come across any convincing explanation. The only remotely plausible suggestion that I've ever encountered (and I can't for the life of me remember where I saw it) suggested that it had something to do with people trying to differentiate the actor from the dish "cordon bleu"... but that seems pretty unsatisfying...
The "chicken cordon bleu" theory doesn't seem to hold a lot of weight, considering it would only really apply to the English version (the disclaimer at the top of his page seems to be present on the English page only)
Someone please help me get to the bottom of this so that I may die peacefully.
Links:
Buzzfeed article
MIT study
Edit: Formatting
Edit2: Incredible. In less than a few hours, u/Lithide may have found our culprit: Wikipedia user Zimmer610, AKA Chace Watson: a polyglot, Corbin-superfan from either Liepzig, Germany, or Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (most likely), whose had multiple accounts and quite a few run-ins with the (Wikipedia) authorities...
Unfortunately, this incredible detective work simply raises as many questions as it answers. Just who is this mysterious figure? What is his aim? More importantly... Why???
Edit3: Thanks for the gold/silver, kind stranger(s). Also, quick congrats to u/Lithide again for making /r/bestof for his research. You are truly doing God's work (and considerably more work than those bozos over at Buzzfeed, I might add).
Some redditors have pointed out that despite having a probable suspect, we are no closer to discovering the "why" of the matter. A valid criticism – but I would add that prior to this post, the idea that this was could have been done intentionally by a single person or group of people was dismissed by the author of the original article. So managing to prove otherwise, in my mind, considerably narrows the range of possibilities
To the extent that "why" refers to the motivations of the person responsible, it's probable that we'll never know the truth. Without contacting the person directly, to continue the inquiry into this person's motivations would simply invite baseless speculation...
BASELESS SPECULATION:
...which happens to be something Reddit excels at.
The most common theory seems to be what I'll call the "superfan" theory: the idea that some dedicated wiki-user decided to combine his/her obsession with a particular HSM supporting actor with a love of languages.
While this seems plausible, I did have a few observations that seemed noteworthy:
Even if Corbin Bleu was your night and day, this seems to be a particularly odd way of showing your appreciation. For starters, it's not as if the information about the number of translations is readily accessible or particularly noteworthy to most people. While the data is all publicly available, to my knowledge it's not listed anywhere in particular, and (I assume) would have had to be compiled by the MIT research team in 2013.
The author's primary language seems to be Arabic, for which he/she has written the longest and most substantial article. But the vast majority of these articles consist of nothing more than a single line of text, mentioning only basic biographical information: Birth year, nationality, occupation, etc.
According to several native speakers, the language and grammar used in some of these articles (Chinese, Korean, etc.)is rudimentary at best, possibly the result of an online translator of some sort. (Also interesting is the number of "dead" languages apparently associated with the user, such as Nahautl (Aztec), Old English, and Pennsylvania Dutch)
One Redditor shared some very interesting insights about koalas. This has nothing to do with the matter at hand, but I found it educational nonetheless and well worth the read.
Want to add to the discussion?
Post a comment!